Balderas v. Rovio Entertainment Corporation
| Hector Balderas |
| Rovio Entertainment Corporation |
| 1:2021cv00824 |
| August 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Laura Fashing |
| Kirtan Khalsa |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 0045 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE by Hector Balderas REGARDING SERVICE UNDER THE HAGUE CONVENTION OF 1965 (Carney, James) |
| Summons Issued as to Rovio Entertainment Corporation. (arp) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by David F. Slade on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Slade, David) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph H Bates on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Bates, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by James Allen Carney on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Carney, James) |
| Filing 3 APPENDIX/SUPPLEMENT re #1 Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet by Hector Balderas (Khoury, Cholla) |
| Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (arp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against State of New Mexico ex rel.Hector Balderas, Attorney General ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by State of New Mexico ex rel.Hector Balderas, Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7)(Khoury, Cholla) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-7858385 re #1 Complaint, filed by Hector Balderas (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Khoury, Cholla) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing and United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa assigned. (arp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Balderas v. Rovio Entertainment Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Hector Balderas | |
| Represented By: | Brian E. McMath |
| Represented By: | Cholla Khoury |
| Represented By: | David F. Slade |
| Represented By: | James Allen Carney |
| Represented By: | Joseph H Bates |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Rovio Entertainment Corporation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
