Chavez v. United States of America et al
Nattlee Nichole Chavez |
United States of America, United States of Department of Agriculture and John Does 1-4 |
1:2021cv00872 |
September 3, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
James O Browning |
Steven C Yarbrough |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ***FILED IN ERROR - INCORRECT CASE*** MOTION to Proceed under 28 U.S.C. 1915 (Long Form) by Nattlee Nichole Chavez. (jg) Modified on 9/3/2021 (jg). |
Filing 4 CM/ECF PRO SE NOTIFICATION FORM Electing to receive notification via e-mail by Nattlee Nichole Chavez. Email address is inactive. (jg) |
Filing 3 Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number ALB050711 re #1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Nattlee Nichole Chavez. (jg) filed by Nattlee Nichole Chavez (arp)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough has been assigned for a 28 U.S.C. 1915 review. (jg)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Nattlee Nichole Chavez. (jg) |
United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough assigned. (jg) |
Summons Issued as to United States of Department of Agriculture. (bp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.