Ervin v. The United States et al
| Michael W. Ervin |
| The United States and Internal Revenue Service |
| 1:2021cv00949 |
| September 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| James O Browning |
| Jerry H Ritter |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
MOTION for Addition of Exhibits by Michael W. Ervin. (bap)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Change Name and Address of Institutional by Michael W. Ervin (bap)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to Admit Further Exhibits by Michael W. Ervin. (bap)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Change/Correction of Address effective as of November 1, 2021 by Michael W. Ervin (bap)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Coming Address Change by Michael W. Ervin (bap)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter by District Judge James O. Browning. (bap)
|
|
Filing 3
APPENDIX/SUPPLEMENT re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael W. Ervin. (cmm)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael W. Ervin. (arp)
|
|
Filing 1
1983 PRISONER'S CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT - Motion to Compel a Response against All Defendants, filed by Michael W. Ervin. (arp)
|
|
United States District Judge James O. Browning and United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter assigned. (arp)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
