Danderson v. Walmart East, LP et al
| Mandy Danderson |
| Walmart East, LP and Thomasina Gonzales |
| 1:2021cv00976 |
| October 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Kenneth J Gonzales |
| Kirtan Khalsa |
| Jerry H Ritter |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
RESPONSE to Motion re #3 MOTION to Remand filed by Thomasina Gonzales, Walmart East, LP. (Gonzalez, Jose)
|
|
Filing 6
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER FINDING GOOD CAUSE TO DELAY SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa. Entry of a scheduling order will be delayed until the Plaintiff's pending motion to remand is resolved. (rps)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF CONSENT SUBMISSION DEADLINE: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2), the parties are reminded that a magistrate judge was assigned as the trial judge in this matter under 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The parties are advised that the Clerk will reassign this matter to a district judge as the trial judge no later than 10 days from the entry of this notice unless consents from all parties have been filed. The parties are free to withhold consent. If you have already entered your consent, you need not resubmit. (mlt)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Remand by Mandy Danderson. (Machin, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 2
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from Second Judicial District Court, Bernalillo County, New Mexico, case number D-202-CV-2021-05064. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Frazier Declaration), #2 Exhibit B (Edwards Declaration), #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Appendix State court documents)(Gonzalez, Jose)
|
|
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-7929420 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Thomasina Gonzales, Walmart East, LP (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Gonzalez, Jose)
|
|
United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter and United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa assigned. (jg)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
