Murray v. United States et al
| Tom Murray |
| United States and Internal Revenue Services |
| 1:2021cv01001 |
| October 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Judith C Herrera |
| Steven C Yarbrough |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough granting #5 Motion to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (Motion to Compel a Response). (cm)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to Compel a Response by Tom Murray. (mjr)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER to Cure Defects by Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough. (cm)
|
|
Filing 3
REDACTED 1983 PRISONER'S CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Tom Murray (jg)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER TO SEAL by Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough. In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, the Clerks Office shall SEAL Plaintiff's opening pleading, Doc. #1 , which contains his social security number (SSN) and date of birth (DOB), and FILE a public copy of the pleading with the SSN and DOB redacted. (kfo)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
|
|
Filing 1
1983 PRISONER'S CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Tom Murray. (arp)
|
|
United States District Judge Judith C. Herrera and United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough assigned. (arp)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
