Borrego v. New Mexico Livestock Board et al
Gilbert Borrego |
New Mexico Livestock Board, Dennis Alarid and Benjamin Gonzales |
1:2021cv01042 |
October 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Carmen E Garza |
Kea W Riggs |
Steven C Yarbrough |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to District Judge Kea W. Riggs as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr) |
Filing 6 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough. Joint Status Report due by 1/7/2022. Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 1/20/2022 at 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than 12/15/2021. (kfo) |
Filing 5 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Dennis Alarid, Benjamin Gonzales, New Mexico Livestock Board (Sullivan, James) |
Filing 4 Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Dennis Alarid, Benjamin Gonzales, New Mexico Livestock Board. (Sullivan, James) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by Dennis Alarid, Benjamin Gonzales, New Mexico Livestock Board Agreed Upon Extension of Time for Defendants to File an Answer (Sullivan, James) |
Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Dennis Alarid, Benjamin Gonzales, New Mexico Livestock Board from First Judicial District Court, case number D-117-CV-2021-00348. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Dennis Alarid, Benjamin Gonzales, New Mexico Livestock Board. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5)(Sullivan, James) |
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-7965206 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Dennis Alarid, New Mexico Livestock Board, Benjamin Gonzales (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Sullivan, James) |
United States Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza and United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough assigned. (jg) |
Office code correction. Case office code has been changed from 6 (Santa Fe) to 1 (Albuquerque). (jg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.