Kerr v. GPS International, LLC
| Billy Kerr |
| GPS International, LLC |
| 1:2021cv01140 |
| November 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Gregory B Wormuth |
| Steven C Yarbrough |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth. Joint Status Report due by 3/3/2022. Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set before Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth for 3/17/2022 at 2:00 PM. Parties shall call Judge Wormuth's teleconference line at (877) 402-9753, access code 7578461, to be connected to the proceedings. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than 2/11/2022. (ceo)
|
| Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by GPS International, LLC. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Billy Kerr.(Seale, Michael) |
| Summons Issued as to GPS International, LLC. (dr) |
| Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GPS International, LLC ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Billy Kerr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Consent, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Parmet, Matthew) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-8012221 re #1 Complaint filed by Billy Kerr (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Parmet, Matthew) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough and United States Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth assigned. (dr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kerr v. GPS International, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Billy Kerr | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Scott Parmet |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: GPS International, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Michael D. Seale |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
