Muniz v. Panda Express, Inc. et al
Mario Muniz |
Panda Express, Inc., John Does 1-3 and John Does |
1:2021cv01153 |
December 3, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Kirtan Khalsa |
Jerry H Ritter |
Personal Injury: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report and Provisional Discovery Plan by Panda Express, Inc. (Najjar, Jared) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Mario Muniz (Smith, Roger) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Panda Express, Inc. (Najjar, Jared) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF RULE 73 CONSENT Received by All Parties. Related documents: 6 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, filed by Mario Muniz, 3 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, filed by Panda Express, Inc.. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr) |
Filing 6 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Mario Muniz voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Smith, Roger)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
![]() |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Panda Express, Inc.. (Najjar, Jared) |
Filing 3 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Panda Express, Inc. voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Najjar, Jared)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-8019719 re #1 Notice of Removal,, filed by Panda Express, Inc. (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Najjar, Jared) |
Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Panda Express, Inc. from State of New Mexico Second Judicial District Court, case number D-202-CV-2021-06292. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Panda Express, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A (Complaint), #2 Exhibit Exhibit B (Notice of Filing Notice of Removal), #3 Exhibit Exhibit C (Arbitration Certificate State Court), #4 Exhibit Exhibit D (Summons Return), #5 Exhibit Exhibit E (Docket), #6 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Supplement Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement)(Najjar, Jared) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.