Martinez v. Houser, et al.
Marcelina Martinez |
Eric D. Houser, Houser & Allison, APC, Houser LLP, Solomon Krotzer, John Does 1-10 and John Does |
1:2021cv01186 |
December 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
William P Johnson |
Gregory B Wormuth |
Steven C Yarbrough |
Consumer Credit |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 JUDGMENT by Chief District Judge William P. Johnson. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 5) is hereby GRANTED, thus disposing of this case in its entirety. (cmm) |
Filing 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief District Judge William P. Johnson Granting #5 Defendants' MOTION to Dismiss. However, it dismisses WITHOUT PREJUDICE due to lack of standing. (cmm) |
Filing 14 MOTION - Request to E-File by Marcelina Martinez. (cmm) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Briefing Complete by Eric D. Houser, Houser LLP, Solomon Krotzer re #5 MOTION to Dismiss with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(1), 12(b)(5) and 12(b)(6) filed by Eric D. Houser, Houser LLP, Solomon Krotzer (Krotzer, Solomon) |
Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(1), 12(b)(5) and 12(b)(6) filed by Eric D. Houser, Houser LLP, Solomon Krotzer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E) (Krotzer, Solomon) |
Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(1), 12(b)(5) and 12(b)(6) filed by Marcelina Martinez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4) (cmm) |
Filing 10 NOTICE REGARDING DOCUMENT ENTRIES: Because this case has been reassigned to a district judge, please be advised that any documents filed by the parties under Rule 73(b) have been permanently removed from the docket. Document(s) removed: Nos. 7 and 8. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (bl) |
Filing 9 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to Chief District Judge William P. Johnson as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF CONSENT SUBMISSION DEADLINE: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2), the parties are reminded that a magistrate judge was assigned as the trial judge in this matter under 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The parties are advised that the Clerk will reassign this matter to a district judge as the trial judge no later than 11 days from the entry of this notice unless consents from all parties have been filed. The parties are free to withhold consent. If you have already entered your consent, you need not resubmit. (kfo)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(1), 12(b)(5) and 12(b)(6) by Eric D. Houser, Houser LLP, Solomon Krotzer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-11) (Krotzer, Solomon) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Eric D. Houser, Houser LLP, Solomon Krotzer re 3 Notice of Magistrate Judge Assignment (Text Only),,, (Krotzer, Solomon) |
Filing 3 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Eric D. Houser, a Law Corporation f/k/a Houser & Allison, Houser LLP, Solomon Krotzer (Krotzer, Solomon) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Solomon Krotzer, Houser LLP, Eric D. Houser, a Law Corporation f/k/a Houser & Allison from First Judicial District Court - Santa Fe County, case number D-101-CV-2021-02469. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Solomon Krotzer, Houser LLP, Eric D. Houser, a Law Corporation f/k/a Houser & Allison. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Krotzer, Solomon) |
United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough and United States Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth assigned. (jg) |
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-8034488 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Houser LLP, Solomon Krotzer, Eric D. Houser, a Law Corporation f/k/a Houser & Allison (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Krotzer, Solomon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.