Padilla v. Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Dulcinia Padilla
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2022cv00049
Filed: January 24, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Presiding Judge: Karen B Molzen
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen Setting Briefing Schedule. Motion to Remand Due 5/23/2022. Response Due 7/25/2022. Reply Due 8/9/2022. (am)
March 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen granting #12 Unopposed Motion to Seal. (KBM)
March 23, 2022 Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION to Seal Administrative Record (Transcript) by Social Security Administration. (Lucero, Manuel)
March 23, 2022 Filing 11 ANSWER to #6 Amended Complaint by Social Security Administration.(Lucero, Manuel)
March 7, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Marc Thayne Warner on behalf of Social Security Administration (Warner, Marc)
February 1, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE OF RULE 73 CONSENT Received by All Parties. Related documents: 4 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, filed by Dulcinia Padilla, 8 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, filed by Social Security Administration. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr)
January 31, 2022 Filing 8 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Social Security Administration voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Lucero, Manuel)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
January 31, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Manuel Lucero on behalf of Social Security Administration (Lucero, Manuel)
January 25, 2022 Summons Issued on Amended Complaint as to Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (jg) Modified on 1/25/2022 (jg).
January 24, 2022 Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration., filed by Dulcinia Padilla. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Johnson, Laura)
January 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is authorized to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee, costs, or security therefore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States Marshal shall serve a copy of the Summons and Complaint on the United States Attorney, the Attorney General, and the Office of the General Counsel, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3). (KBM)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
January 24, 2022 Filing 4 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Dulcinia Padilla voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Johnson, Laura)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
January 24, 2022 Filing 3 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr)
January 24, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Dulcinia Padilla. (Johnson, Laura)
January 24, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration ( Filing Fee - Waived), filed by Dulcinia Padilla. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Johnson, Laura)
January 24, 2022 United States Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen assigned. (dr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Padilla v. Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dulcinia Padilla
Represented By: Laura J. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Manuel Lucero
Represented By: Marc Thayne Warner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?