Poncho-Alderete v. Social Security Administration
| Monique Poncho-Alderete |
| Social Security Administration |
| 1:2022cv00153 |
| February 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Jerry H Ritter |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Appearance by Marc Thayne Warner on behalf of Social Security Administration (Warner, Marc)
|
|
Filing 12
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration., filed by Monique Poncho-Alderete. (dr)
|
|
Filing 11
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER to Cure Defects by Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter. Amended Complaint due by 4/12/2022. (mlt)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Appearance by Manuel Lucero on behalf of Social Security Administration (Lucero, Manuel)
|
|
Filing 9
SUMMONS Returned Executed US Attorney General served on 3/15/2022, answer due 5/16/2022. (jg)
|
|
Filing 8
SUMMONS Returned Executed Social Security Administration served on 3/15/2022, answer due 5/16/2022. (jg)
|
|
Filing 7
SUMMONS Returned Executed US Attorney NM served on 3/15/2022, answer due 5/16/2022. (jg)
|
|
Filing 6
SUPPLEMENT to Complaint by Monique Poncho-Alderete (dr)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is authorized to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee, costs, or security therefore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States Marshal shall serve a copy of the Summons and Complaint on the United States Attorney, the Attorney General, and the Office of the General Counsel, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3). (mlt)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
|
|
Filing 4
CM/ECF ProSe Notification Form by Monique Poncho-Alderete (dr)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Monique Poncho-Alderete. (dr)
|
|
Filing 2
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter has been assigned for a 28 U.S.C. 1915 review. (dr)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration, filed by Monique Poncho-Alderete. (dr)
|
|
United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter assigned. (dr)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Poncho-Alderete v. Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Monique Poncho-Alderete | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Manuel Lucero |
| Represented By: | Marc Thayne Warner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
