Madera v. Taos Health Systems, Inc. et al
| George J Madera |
| Taos Health Systems, Inc. doing business as Holy Cross Hospital, Holy Cross Hospital, Board of Directors of Holy Cross Hospital, Medical Staff of Holy Cross Hospital and John Does 1-10 |
| 1:2022cv00285 |
| April 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| John F Robbenhaar |
| Steven C Yarbrough |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough granting #7 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants' response to Plaintiff's amended complaint is due 06/29/2022. (cm)
|
| Filing 7 Joint MOTION to Extend (other) Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint by Taos Health Systems, Inc.. (West, Little) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), George J Madera voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Davis, Bryan)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Little West on behalf of All Defendants (West, Little) |
| Summons on Amended Complaint Issued as to Board of Directors of Holy Cross Hospital, Taos Health Systems, Inc.. (jg) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES ARISING FROM BREACH OF CONTRACT, INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE WITH CONTRACTUAL RELATIONS, INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE WITH PROSPECTIVE ECOMONIC RELATIONS, AND DEFAMATION against All Defendants ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by George J Madera. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Davis, Bryan) Modified on 4/18/2022 (jg). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by George J Madera re #1 Complaint, Notice of Errata (Davis, Bryan) |
| Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES ARISING FROM BREACH OF CONTRACT, INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE WITH CONTRACTUAL RELATIONS, INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE WITH PROSPECTIVE ECOMONIC RELATIONS, AND DEFAMATION against TAOS HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by George J Madera. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Davis, Bryan) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-8222288 re #1 Complaint, filed by George J Madera (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Davis, Bryan) |
| United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar and United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough assigned. (jg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
