Romero v. Social Security Administration
Vanessa Romero |
Social Security Administration |
1:2022cv00351 |
May 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Stephan M Vidmar |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Vanessa Romero. Kilolo Kijakazi served on 6/13/2022, answer due 8/12/2022. (vh) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Vanessa Romero. Merrick Garland served on 6/21/2022, answer due 8/22/2022. (vh) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Vanessa Romero. U.S. Attorney for the District of NM served on 6/10/2022, answer due 8/9/2022. (vh) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF RULE 73 CONSENT Received by All Parties. Related documents: 8 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge filed by Social Security Administration & 6 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge filed by Vanessa Romero. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (rh) |
Filing 8 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Social Security Administration voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Lucero, Manuel)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Manuel Lucero on behalf of Social Security Administration (Lucero, Manuel) |
Filing 6 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Vanessa Romero voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Decker, Benjamin)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Summons Issued as to Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (dr) |
Filing 5 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar GRANTING #2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (am) |
Filing 4 FILED IN ERROR - ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar GRANTING #2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (am) Modified on 5/11/2022 (rh). |
Filing 3 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Vanessa Romero. (Decker, Benjamin) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi ( Filing Fee - Waived), filed by Vanessa Romero. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Decker, Benjamin) |
United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar assigned. (jg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Romero v. Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Vanessa Romero | |
Represented By: | Benjamin Eilers Decker |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
Represented By: | Manuel Lucero |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.