Vine v. Martinez et al
| Brandon Vine |
| Leon Martinez, Sergeant D Gonzales, John Deporto, John Gonzales #1 and John Gonzales #2 |
| 1:2022cv00353 |
| May 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Laura Fashing |
| Stephan M Vidmar |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendment |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Leon Martinez voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Wells, Deborah)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 9 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Leon Martinez (Wells, Deborah) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Leon Martinez. Related document: #1 Complaint, filed by Brandon Vine.(Wells, Deborah) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Deborah D. Wells on behalf of Leon Martinez (Wells, Deborah) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brandon Vine. Leon Martinez served on 5/14/2022, answer due 6/6/2022. (Raphaelson, Sheri) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Brandon Vine Certificate of Service on Leon Martinez (Raphaelson, Sheri) |
| Summons Issued as to Hector Balderas c/of Leon Martinez. (dr) |
| Summons Issued as to Leon Martinez. (jg) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Brandon Vine voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Raphaelson, Sheri)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 3 APPENDIX/SUPPLEMENT re #1 Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet by Brandon Vine (Raphaelson, Sheri) |
| Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar and United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing assigned. (jg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Complaint for the Recovery of Damages Caused by the Deprivation of Civil Rights against All Defendants ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Brandon Lee Vine. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Raphaelson, Sheri) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-8258637 re #1 Complaint, filed by Brandon Lee Vine (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Raphaelson, Sheri) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
