Reeves v. Pope Agustine of Rome et al
| Robert Wallace Reeves |
| Pope Agustine of Rome, Cutheral of Asterdam and Babist Cutheral of Noteter Dom |
| 1:2022cv00369 |
| May 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Kirtan Khalsa |
| Kea W Riggs |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
RULE 58 JUDGMENT by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. Pursuant to the #5 Memorandum Opinion and Order of Dismissal entered on May 18, 2022, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (ve)
|
|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. (ve)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (jdm)
|
|
United States District Judge Kea W. Riggs assigned. (jg)
|
|
Filing 3
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa has been assigned for a 28 U.S.C. 1915 review. (jg)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert Wallace Reeves. (jg)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Robert Wallace Reeves. (jg)
|
|
United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa assigned. (jg)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
