Brock v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company
| Glenn Brock |
| Progressive Direct Insurance Company |
| 1:2022cv00502 |
| July 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Jerry H Ritter |
| Stephan M Vidmar |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar. Joint Status Report is due by October 4, 2022. A telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for October 25, 2022, at 10:30 a.m. MDT. Counsel must call Judge Vidmar's AT&T Conference Line at (888) 363-4734 (access code: 4382538) to connect to the proceedings. (nlb)
|
| Filing 10 Clerk's Minutes for telephonic status conference held before Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar on August 23, 2022. (Recording Info: MARS) (nlb) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Progressive Direct Insurance Company voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Allen, Meena)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF RULE 73 CONSENT Received by All Parties. Related documents: 4 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, filed by Progressive Direct Insurance Company, 7 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, filed by Glenn Brock. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Glenn Brock voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Zangara, Kevin)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
|
Filing 6
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar SETTING telephonic Status Conference for August 23, 2022, at 10:30 a.m. MDT. Counsel must call Judge Vidmar's AT&T Conference Line at (888) 363-4734 (access code: 4382538) to connect to the proceedings. (nlb)
|
| Filing 5 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Progressive Direct Insurance Company (Allen, Meena) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Progressive Direct Insurance Company voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Allen, Meena)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Progressive Direct Insurance Company. (Allen, Meena) |
| Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter and United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar assigned. (dr) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Progressive Direct Insurance Company from Eighth Judicial District Court, case number D-820-CV-2022-00162. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Progressive Direct Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Allen, Meena) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-8355173 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Progressive Direct Insurance Company (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Allen, Meena) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brock v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Glenn Brock | |
| Represented By: | Kevin A Zangara |
| Represented By: | Taylor Zangara |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Progressive Direct Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Jacqueline Mosher |
| Represented By: | Meena H Allen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
