Dillon v. Dish Network LLC et al
| John Dillon |
| Dish Network LLC, Dish Network Service LLC and John Doe |
| 1:2022cv00557 |
| July 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Laura Fashing |
| Jerry H Ritter |
| Martha Vazquez |
| Personal Injury: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to District Judge Martha Vazquez as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER re #5 #6 by Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter. The scheduling conference currently set for 9/28/2022 is VACATED pending the filing of a motion for substitution of party. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a). If the motion is granted, the scheduling conference will be reset. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (cd)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE by John Dillon Suggestion of Death (Higgins, John)
|
|
Filing 5
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter setting a Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference for 9/28/2022 at 02:30 PM in Albuquerque - Telephonic Hearing/Conference before Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter. Joint Status Report and Provisional Discovery Plan due by 9/21/2022. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than 9/8/2022. (cd)
|
|
Filing 4
ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Dish Network LLC, Dish Network Service LLC, John Doe. (Garcia, Monica)
|
|
Filing 3
Filing Fee: $ 402, receipt number 1000123 (snw)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
|
|
Filing 2
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Dish Network Service LLC, Dish Network LLC from Eighth Judicial District Court, case number D-820-CV-2022-00183. ( Filing Fee - Deliver Payment), filed by Dish Network Service LLC, Dish Network LLC. (Garcia, Monica)
|
|
United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing and United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter assigned. (jg)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
