Chamas v. GEICO General Insurance Company et al
| Elizabeth Chamas |
| GEICO General Insurance Company and GEICO Indemnity Company |
| 1:2022cv00606 |
| August 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| John F Robbenhaar |
| Kevin R Sweazea |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION of Dismissal by GEICO General Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company (Mitchell, Jeffrey) |
Filing 8
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: by Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar. Joint Status Report due by 9/16/2022. Telephone Scheduling Conference set for 9/26/2022 at 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar. Counsel will call Judge Robbenhaar's AT&T Teleconference Line at (888) 363-4735, Access Code 2387395, to connect to the proceedings. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than 9/6/2022. (ajp)
|
| Filing 7 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by GEICO Indemnity Company identifying Corporate Parent GEICO Indemnity Company for GEICO Indemnity Company. (Mitchell, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by GEICO General Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent GEICO General Insurance Company for GEICO General Insurance Company. (Mitchell, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey M. Mitchell on behalf of GEICO General Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company (Mitchell, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by GEICO Indemnity Company. (Mitchell, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by GEICO General Insurance Company. (Mitchell, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company from Second Judicial District Court, case number D-202-CV-2022-03746. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-1 State Docket, #2 Exhibit 1-2 State Complaint, #3 Exhibit 1-3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mitchell, Jeffrey) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-8413345 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Mitchell, Jeffrey) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea and United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar assigned. (jg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
