Hausler v. Vivint Solar Developer, LLC et al
| Philomena Hausler |
| Vivint Solar Developer, LLC a Delaware limited liability company doing business as SunRun, SunRun Inc. and Troy McGee |
| 1:2022cv00623 |
| August 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Kea W Riggs |
| Jerry H Ritter |
| John F Robbenhaar |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Petition for Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER by District Judge Kea W. Riggs granting #12 Motion to Stay Case Stayed for 45 calendar days from this date. (cab)
|
| Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION to Stay Case for 45 days by Philomena Hausler. (Kramer, David) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action filed by Philomena Hausler. (Kramer, David) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER by District Judge Kea W. Riggs granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Responses due by 9/23/2022 (cab)
|
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to #4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action by Philomena Hausler. (Kramer, David) Modified on 9/21/2022 (cmm). |
| Filing 8 Transmittal of State Court Documents by SunRun Inc., Vivint Solar Developer, LLC (Attachments: #1 Appendix) (Ferguson, Kenneth) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Stay pending a ruling on Plaintiff's Motion for Remand by Philomena Hausler. (Kramer, David) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Remand by Philomena Hausler. (Kramer, David) |
| Filing 5 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to United States District Judge Kea W. Riggs as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action by SunRun Inc., Vivint Solar Developer, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Law in Support, #2 Exhibit to Memo of Law) (Ferguson, Kenneth) |
| Filing 3 OBJECTIONS to Plaintiff's Subpoena Directed to the New Mexico Attorney General by SunRun Inc., Vivint Solar Developer, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Ferguson, Kenneth) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Vivint Solar Developer, LLC identifying Corporate Parent SunRun Inc., Corporate Parent Vivint Solar, Inc., Corporate Parent Vivint Solar Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent Vivint Solar Operations, LLC for Vivint Solar Developer, LLC. (Ferguson, Kenneth) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by SunRun Inc., Vivint Solar Developer, LLC from 2nd Judicial Dist Ct Bernalillo, case number D-202-cv-2022-03962. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by SunRun Inc., Vivint Solar Developer, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ferguson, Kenneth) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-8422906 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Vivint Solar Developer, LLC, SunRun Inc. (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Ferguson, Kenneth) |
| United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar and United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter assigned. (dr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
