Cardenas et al v. General Motors, LLC
Plaintiff: Adam Cardenas and Marie Cardenas
Defendant: GENERAL MOTORS LLC, General Motors, LLC and FNU Does
Case Number: 1:2022cv00650
Filed: September 1, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Presiding Judge: Gregory J Fouratt
Referring Judge: Kirtan Khalsa
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER VACATING INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE and SETTING DEADLINE FOR CLOSING DOCUMENTS by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa. The Telephonic Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference previously set for October 21, 2022, before Judge Khalsa, and the deadlines fixed in the Initial Scheduling Order (Doc. #3 ) are VACATED. Closing documents are due no later than December 27, 2022. (nlb)
September 22, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Settlement by General Motors, LLC (Rinner, Todd)
September 9, 2022 Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by General Motors, LLC identifying Corporate Parent General Motors Company for General Motors, LLC. (Rinner, Todd)
September 9, 2022 Filing 5 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), General Motors, LLC voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Rinner, Todd)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
September 8, 2022 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by General Motors, LLC. (Rinner, Todd)
September 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa. Counsel are to meet and confer by 09/30/2022. The parties' Joint Status Report and Provisional Discovery Plan is due by 10/11/2022. A Telephonic Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference is set for 10/21/2022 at 10:30 AM MDT before Judge Khalsa. Counsel are to call Judge Khalsa's AT&T conference line at (877) 848-7030 and enter the code 7324132 to connect to the proceedings. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than 10/14/2022. (nlb)
September 2, 2022 Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr)
September 2, 2022 United States Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt and United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa assigned. (dr)
September 1, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by GENERAL MOTORS LLC from Second Judicial District Court, case number D-202-CV-2022-04120. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by GENERAL MOTORS LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Rinner, Todd)
September 1, 2022 Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-8443956 re #1 Notice of Removal filed by GENERAL MOTORS LLC (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Rinner, Todd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cardenas et al v. General Motors, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adam Cardenas
Represented By: Andrew Bandzar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marie Cardenas
Represented By: Andrew Bandzar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GENERAL MOTORS LLC
Represented By: Todd Rinner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: General Motors, LLC
Represented By: Todd Rinner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FNU Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?