Olivas v. Truitt et al
| Hector Olivas |
| Lauren Truitt, Molly Kicklighter and Joseph Bailey |
| 1:2022cv00746 |
| October 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Kea W Riggs |
| Gregory B Wormuth |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 FINAL JUDGMENT by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), and consistent with the #5 Order of Dismissal entered on December 5, 2022, this civil action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (ve) |
Filing 5
ORDER OF DISMISSAL by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. Plaintiff Hector Olivas' #1 Letter-Petition Regarding State Conviction is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and the Court SHALL ENTER a separate judgment CLOSING the civil case. (ve)
|
| Filing 4 Letter by Hector Olivas. (cmm) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO CURE DEFICIENCIES by Chief Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth. Plaintiff shall refile claims and pay filing fee within thirty (30) days of entry of this Order. (emm)
|
| Filing 2 Letter by Hector Olivas. (cmm) |
| Filing 1 1983 PRISONER'S CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Hector Olivas. (jg) |
| United States District Judge Kea W. Riggs and Chief United States Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth assigned. (jg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
