Arredondo Jr. v. Chavez Baker et al
| Jose Arredondo Jr. |
| Amanda Chavez Baker and Ashley Schneller |
| 1:2022cv00803 |
| October 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Kenneth J Gonzales |
| Steven C Yarbrough |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
FINAL JUDGMENT by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales. (tah)
|
|
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales. (tah)
|
|
United States District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales assigned. (jg)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough granting #2 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs and ORDER to amend. (cm)
|
|
Filing 4
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough has been assigned for a 28 U.S.C. 1915 review. (jg)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
|
|
Filing 3
CMECF PRO SE NOTIFICATION FORM electing to receive notification via Email by Jose Arredondo Jr. (jg)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jose Arredondo Jr.. (jg)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Amanda Chavez Baker, Ashley Schneller, filed by Jose Arredondo Jr.. (jg)
|
|
United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough assigned. (jg)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
