Qwest Corporation v. High 5 Networks, LLC et al
| Qwest Corporation |
| High 5 Networks, LLC and High 5 Networks II, LLC |
| 1:2022cv00912 |
| November 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Laura Fashing |
| Jerry H Ritter |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Joint Status Report and Provisional Discovery Plan by Qwest Corporation (Jorgenson, Anthony) |
Filing 7
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter. Joint Status Report due by February 7, 2023 (2/7/2023). Scheduling Conference set for February 14, 2023 (2/14/2023) at 09:00 AM in Las Cruces - Telephonic Hearing/Conference before Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter. Counsel shall call my toll-free AT&T conference line (888) 278-0296 and enter access code 9998216 to be let into the conference. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than 2/8/2023. (sjl)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by High 5 Networks, LLC. Related document: #1 Complaint, filed by Qwest Corporation.(Saucedo, Christopher) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Qwest Corporation voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Jorgenson, Anthony)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Qwest Corporation as to High 5 Networks, LLC. (Jorgenson, Anthony) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal as to High 5 Networks II, LLC by Qwest Corporation (Jorgenson, Anthony) |
| Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (dr) |
| Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against High 5 Networks II, LLC, High 5 Networks, LLC ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Qwest Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons (High 5 Networks, LLC), #3 Summons (High 5 Networks II, LLC))(Jorgenson, Anthony) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-8573650 re #1 Complaint, filed by Qwest Corporation (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Jorgenson, Anthony) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing and United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter assigned. (jg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
