Lucero Jr v. Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Lawrence Flody Lucero Jr
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2022cv00943
Filed: December 13, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Presiding Judge: Steven C Yarbrough
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION to Seal Administrative Record by Social Security Administration. (Lucero, Manuel)
January 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Jessica Milano on behalf of Social Security Administration (Milano, Jessica)
January 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough. The Court hereby notifies the parties that it will permit stipulations under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 7.4(a) for reasonable extensions of the briefing schedule set by the Supplemental Rules for Social Security. The parties shall file a notice identifying the new deadline and the document (motion, response or reply) to be filed. The parties do not need to submit a proposed order with the notice. If the request for extension of time is opposed, however, the party seeking the extension must file a separate motion. (kfo) [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
January 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE OF RULE 73 CONSENT Received by All Parties. Related documents: 8 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, filed by Lawrence Flody Lucero Jr, 6 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, filed by Social Security Administration. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg)
December 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE OF CONSENT SUBMISSION DEADLINE: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2), the parties are reminded that a magistrate judge was assigned as the trial judge in this matter under 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The parties are advised that the Clerk will reassign this matter to a district judge as the trial judge no later than 14 days from the entry of this notice unless consents from all parties have been filed. The parties are free to withhold consent. If you have already entered your consent, you need not resubmit. (kfo)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
December 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Social Security Administration voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Lucero, Manuel)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
December 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE: The parties are notified that effective December 1, 2022, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were amended to add Supplemental Rules for Social Security cases filed under 42 U.S.C 405(g). Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk hereby transmits a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system to the Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and to the United States Attorney's Office, notifying the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration of the filing of a Complaint in this action. The parties should review and comply with these rules in full. In relevant part, the rules result in the following changes: 1. Eliminate the need for service under FED. R. CIV. P. 4. Instead, the Court will transmit a Notice of Electronic Filing to the SSA's Office of General Counsel and the USAO for the district where the action is filed. 2. Require the Commissioner to file the administrative record within 60 days of receipt of the Notice of Electronic Filing. > 3. Require the parties to adhere to the following briefing schedule: - Plaintiff's brief due 30 days after answer/administrative record filed and served. - Commissioners response due 30 days after plaintiffs brief filed and served. - Plaintiffs reply due 14 days after the Commissioners response filed and served.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.](jg) Modified on 1/23/2023 for full scheduling deadlines. (ng)
December 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. This action is authorized to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee, costs, or security therefore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. (kfo)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
December 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg)
December 13, 2022 Opinion or Order United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough assigned. (jg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lucero Jr v. Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lawrence Flody Lucero Jr
Represented By: Matthew Robert McGarry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Jessica Milano
Represented By: Manuel Lucero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?