Edwards v. Smith
Marc Edwards |
Stephanie Smith |
1:2023cv00010 |
January 4, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
John F Robbenhaar |
Martha Vazquez |
Steven C Yarbrough |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER FOR CLOSING DOCUMENTS by Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar. In light of the Notice of Settlement, the parties are ordered to submit closing documents within 45 days. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (ajp) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Settlement by Stephanie Smith (Holmes, Matthew) |
Reset Deadlines pursuant to #10 Order: Pretrial Motions due by 9/7/2023. (gr) |
Filing 11 Clerk's Minutes for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar: Scheduling Conference held on 2/14/2023 at 9:30 a.m. (ajp) |
Filing 10 ORDER ADOPTING JOINT STATUS REPORT AND PROVISIONAL DISCOVERY PLAN WITH CHANGES AND SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES by Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar. Plaintiff's Expert Witness List due by 5/8/2023. Defendant's Expert Witness List due by 6/7/2023. Discovery due by 8/7/2023. Discovery Motions due by 8/28/2023. Pretrial Motions due by 9/7/2023. (ajp) |
Filing 9 Joint Status Report and Provisional Discovery Plan by Stephanie Smith (Holmes, Matthew) |
Filing 8 NOTICE REGARDING DOCUMENT ENTRIES: Because this case has been reassigned to a district judge, please be advised that any documents filed by the parties under Rule 73(b) have been permanently removed from the docket. Document(s) removed: No. 6. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (kg) |
Filing 7 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to United States District Judge Martha Vazquez as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
Filing 5 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: by Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar. Telephone Scheduling Conference set for 2/14/2023 at 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar. Counsel will call Judge Robbenhaar's AT&T Teleconference Line at (888) 363-4735, Access Code 2387395, to connect to the proceedings. Joint Status Report due by 2/6/2023. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than 1/27/2023. (ajp) |
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-8620615 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Stephanie Smith (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Holmes, Matthew) |
Filing 4 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
Filing 3 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Stephanie Smith. (Holmes, Matthew) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Timothy Sullivan on behalf of Stephanie Smith (Sullivan, Michael) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Stephanie Smith from Santa Fe County District Court, case number D-101-CV-2022-01945. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Stephanie Smith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Holmes, Matthew) |
United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough and United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar assigned. (jg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Edwards v. Smith | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Marc Edwards | |
Represented By: | Andras Szantho |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Stephanie Smith | |
Represented By: | Michael Timothy Sullivan |
Represented By: | Matthew A Holmes |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.