Mae v. MKJS Investments I, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Fannie Mae
Defendant: MKJS Investments I, LLC, MKJS Investments II, LLC, Mihail Koulakis and Jane Doe Koulakis
Case Number: 1:2023cv00014
Filed: January 6, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Presiding Judge: Laura Fashing
Referring Judge: Kirtan Khalsa
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 6, 2023 Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Jane Doe Koulakis, Mihail Koulakis, MKJS Investments I, LLC, MKJS Investments II, LLC (Giddens, George)
March 6, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT by Jane Doe Koulakis, Mihail Koulakis, MKJS Investments I, LLC, MKJS Investments II, LLC. (Giddens, George)
January 17, 2023 Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Fannie Mae as to All Defendants. (Ugalde, James)
January 10, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE by Fannie Mae Notice of Good Standing for Attorney Licensed Outside of District (Stimson, Nathan)
January 10, 2023 Filing 5 ASSOCIATION of Attorney Licensed Outside the District for Plaintiff Fannie Mae by Nathan S Stimson on behalf of: James L. Ugalde Clark Hill PLC 3200 N. Central Ave., Suite 1600Phoenix, Arizona 85012 (602) 440-4800 jugalde@clarkhill.com (Association Dues - Online Payment) (Stimson, Nathan)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
January 9, 2023 Filing 4 **FILED IN ERROR** ASSOCIATION of Attorney Licensed Outside the District for Plaintiff Fannie Mae by James L. Ugalde (Association Dues - Online Payment) (Ugalde, James)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] Modified on 1/10/2023 (bp).
January 9, 2023 Summons Issued as to Jane Doe Koulakis, Mihail Koulakis, MKJS Investments I, LLC, MKJS Investments II, LLC. (jg)
January 9, 2023 Association Dues Received: $ 100 receipt number ANMDC-8625394 re: # 4 Association of Attorney Licensed Outside the District, filed by Fannie Mae (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Ugalde, James)
January 6, 2023 Filing 3 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg)
January 6, 2023 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Fannie Mae (Stimson, Nathan)
January 6, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Fannie Mae. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A-Note, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B-Loan Agreement, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C-Mortgage, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D-Guaranty, #6 Exhibit Exhibit E-Assignment)(Stimson, Nathan)
January 6, 2023 Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-8623553 re #1 Complaint, filed by Fannie Mae (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Stimson, Nathan)
January 6, 2023 United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa and United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing assigned. (jg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mae v. MKJS Investments I, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fannie Mae
Represented By: Nathan S Stimson
Represented By: James L. Ugalde
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MKJS Investments I, LLC
Represented By: George D. Giddens, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MKJS Investments II, LLC
Represented By: George D. Giddens, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mihail Koulakis
Represented By: George D. Giddens, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Doe Koulakis
Represented By: George D. Giddens, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?