Rivera v. Xerox Corporation
| Patricia Rivera |
| Xerox Corporation |
| 1:2023cv00089 |
| January 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Laura Fashing |
| Judith C Herrera |
| Kirtan Khalsa |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Briefing Complete by Xerox Corporation re #7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Xerox Corporation (Kneeland, Mishell) |
| Filing 14 REPLY to Response to Motion re #7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Xerox Corporation. (Kneeland, Mishell) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE REGARDING DOCUMENT ENTRIES: Because this case has been reassigned to a district judge, please be advised that any documents filed by the parties under Rule 73(b) have been permanently removed from the docket. Document(s) removed: No. 10. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (kg) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Patricia Rivera. (Candelaria, Jacob) |
| Filing 11 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to United States District Judge Judith C. Herrera as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF NEW CONSENT SUBMISSION DEADLINE: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2), the parties are reminded that a magistrate judge was assigned as the trial judge in this matter under 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The parties are advised that the Clerk will reassign this matter to a district judge as the trial judge no later than 10 days from the entry of this notice unless consents from all parties have been filed. The parties are free to withhold consent. If you have already entered your consent, you need not resubmit. (ccp)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 8
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 (b)(2), the Court finds good cause to delay entering a scheduling order at this time due to the pending dispositive motion (Doc. 7). Therefore, the Court VACATES the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference set for 3/15/2023 at 2 p.m. and all deadlines in the Initial Scheduling Order (Doc. 4). [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.](ccp)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by Xerox Corporation. (Kneeland, Mishell) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Xerox Corporation re 5 Association of Attorney Licensed Outside the District, Mishell B. Kneeland (Stanford, Repps) |
| Filing 5 ASSOCIATION of Attorney Licensed Outside the District for Defendant Xerox Corporation by Repps D Stanford on behalf of: Mishell B. Kneeland Culhane Meadows PLLC 13101 Preston Road, Ste. 110-1510 Dallas, Texas 75240 512-910-5463 mkneeland@cm.law (Association Dues - Online Payment) (Stanford, Repps)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
|
Filing 4
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing. Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference set for 3/15/2023 at 02:00 PM in Albuquerque - Telephonic Hearing/Conference before Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing. Joint Status Report and Provisional Discovery Plan due by 3/8/2023. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than 2/22/2023. (cda)
|
| Association Dues Received: $ 100 receipt number ANMDC-8663738 re: # 5 Association of Attorney Licensed Outside the District, filed by Xerox Corporation (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Stanford, Repps) |
| Filing 3 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa and United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing assigned. (jg) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Xerox Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Xerox Corporation for Xerox Corporation. (Stanford, Repps) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Xerox Corporation from Second Judicial District Court, case number D-202-CV-2021-07105. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Xerox Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Stanford, Repps) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-8659747 re #1 Notice of Removal filed by Xerox Corporation (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Stanford, Repps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rivera v. Xerox Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Patricia Rivera | |
| Represented By: | Jacob R Candelaria |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Xerox Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Repps D Stanford |
| Represented By: | Christopher M. Moody |
| Represented By: | Mishell B. Kneeland |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
