Sotelo v. Sombra Cosmetics, Inc. et al
| Yara Sotelo |
| Sombra Cosmetics, Inc. and Alfredo Cortazar |
| 1:2023cv00148 |
| February 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Kirtan Khalsa |
| Steven C Yarbrough |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
REPLY to Response to Motion re #9 First MOTION to Amend/Correct Notice of Appeal from Order of Determination filed by Yara Sotelo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Order of Non-Determination) (Winters, Jordan)
|
|
Filing 15
REPLY to Response to Motion re #8 MOTION to Remand filed by Yara Sotelo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Order of Non-Determination) (Winters, Jordan)
|
|
Filing 14
RESPONSE to Motion re #9 First MOTION to Amend/Correct Notice of Appeal from Order of Determination filed by Sombra Cosmetics, Inc.. (Padilla, Agnes)
|
|
Filing 13
RESPONSE to Motion re #8 MOTION to Remand filed by Sombra Cosmetics, Inc.. (Padilla, Agnes)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER VACATING INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa. The Telephonic Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference set for April 5, 2023, before Judge Khalsa, and all associated deadlines, are hereby VACATED. See Doc. #7 . [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (nlb)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE OF RULE 73 CONSENT Received by All Parties. Related documents: 10 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, filed by Yara Sotelo, 5 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, filed by Alfredo Cortazar, Sombra Cosmetics, Inc.. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (bc)
|
|
Filing 10
CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Yara Sotelo voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Winters, Jordan)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
|
|
Filing 9
First MOTION to Amend/Correct Notice of Appeal from Order of Determination by Yara Sotelo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit First Amended Notice of Appeal) (Winters, Jordan)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Remand by Yara Sotelo. (Winters, Jordan)
|
|
Filing 7
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa. Counsel are to meet and confer by March 15, 2023. The parties' Joint Status Report and Provisional Discovery Plan is due by March 27, 2023. A Telephonic Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference is set for April 5, 2023, at 10:30 a.m. MT before Judge Khalsa. Counsel are to call Judge Khalsa's AT&T conference line at (877) 848-7030 and enter the code 7324132 to connect to the proceedings. (nlb)
|
|
Filing 6
Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number 1001551 (bp)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
|
|
Filing 5
CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Alfredo Cortazar, Sombra Cosmetics, Inc. voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Padilla, Agnes)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF CONSENT SUBMISSION DEADLINE: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2), the parties are reminded that a magistrate judge was assigned as the trial judge in this matter under 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The parties are advised that the Clerk will reassign this matter to a district judge as the trial judge no later than 10 days from the entry of this notice unless consents from all parties have been filed. The parties are free to withhold consent. If you have already entered your consent, you need not resubmit. (kfo)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
|
|
Filing 3
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg)
|
|
United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough and United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa assigned. (jg)
|
|
Filing 2
Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Alfredo Cortazar, Sombra Cosmetics, Inc.. (Padilla, Agnes)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants To The United States District Court For The District Of New Mexico from Second Judicial District Court, case number D-202-CV-2023-00156. ( Filing Fee - Deliver Payment), filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Attachment (1))(Padilla, Agnes)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
