Cincinnati Specialty Underwriting Producer Resources v. Evanston Insurance Company et al
Cincinnati Specialty Underwriting Producer Resources and Cincinnati Specialty Underwriting Producer Resources, Inc. |
Evanston Insurance Company, Berger-Briggs Real Estate and Insurance, Inc. and Edwin Wilson |
1:2023cv00287 |
April 3, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Laura Fashing |
William P Johnson |
Kevin R Sweazea |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgment |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 NOTICE of Briefing Complete by Evanston Insurance Company re #13 MOTION to Strike #3 Amended Complaint, and/or Partially Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint filed by Evanston Insurance Company (Samberg, Amy) |
Filing 30 REPLY to Response to Motion re #13 MOTION to Strike #3 Amended Complaint, and/or Partially Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint filed by Evanston Insurance Company. (Samberg, Amy) |
Filing 29 NOTICE by Cincinnati Specialty Underwriting Producer Resources, Inc. re #26 Response in Opposition to Motion, Supplemental Authority (Shane, Richard) |
Filing 28 NOTICE of Briefing Complete by Cincinnati Specialty Underwriting Producer Resources, Inc. re #11 Opposed MOTION to Remand to State Court and Memorandum in Support Thereof filed by Cincinnati Specialty Underwriting Producer Resources, Inc. (Shane, Richard) |
Filing 27 REPLY to Response to Motion re #11 Opposed MOTION to Remand to State Court and Memorandum in Support Thereof filed by Cincinnati Specialty Underwriting Producer Resources, Inc.. (Riley, Mark) |
Filing 26 RESPONSE in Opposition re #13 MOTION to Strike #3 Amended Complaint, and/or Partially Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint filed by Cincinnati Specialty Underwriting Producer Resources, Inc.. (Shane, Richard) |
Filing 25 Defendant Wilson's ANSWER to #6 Amended Complaint, #3 Amended Complaint, , ANSWER to #6 Amended Complaint, #3 Amended Complaint, by Edwin Wilson.(Romero, Geoffrey) |
Filing 24 RESPONSE to Motion re #11 Opposed MOTION to Remand to State Court and Memorandum in Support Thereof filed by Edwin Wilson. (Thompson, Bruce) |
Filing 23 NOTICE of Appearance by Bruce E Thompson on behalf of Edwin Wilson (Thompson, Bruce) |
Filing 22 NOTICE by Evanston Insurance Company re Association Dues for Attorney Licensed Outside the District, 18 Association of Attorney Licensed Outside the District, (Samberg, Amy) |
Filing 21 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 Opposed MOTION to Remand to State Court and Memorandum in Support Thereof filed by Evanston Insurance Company. (Samberg, Amy) |
Filing 20 NOTICE REGARDING DOCUMENT ENTRIES: Because this case has been reassigned to a district judge, please be advised that any documents filed by the parties under Rule 73(b) have been permanently removed from the docket. Document(s) removed: No. 17. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (kg) |
Filing 19 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly reassigned to U.S. Chief District Judge William P. Johnson as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (bc) |
Filing 18 ASSOCIATION of Attorney Licensed Outside the District for Defendant Evanston Insurance Company by Amy M. Samberg on behalf of: Jefferson D. Patten Clyde & Co US LLP 55 West Monroe Street, Suite 3000Chicago, IL 60603 213-358-7600 jefferson.patten@clydeco.us (Association Dues - Online Payment) (Samberg, Amy)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 16 **FILED IN ERROR**ASSOCIATION of Attorney Licensed Outside the District for Defendant Evanston Insurance Company by Jefferson D. Patten (Association Dues - Online Payment) (Patten, Jefferson)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] Modified on 5/3/2023 (dr). |
Filing 15 ORDER FINDING GOOD CAUSE TO DELAY ENTRY OF A SCHEDULING ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea. Considering the pending motions seeking dispositive relief, the Court hereby finds good cause under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 to delay holding a scheduling conference and entering a scheduling order. The Court will set the case for scheduling once the presiding judge resolves the pending motion. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. NO DOCUMENTS ARE ATTACHED.] (atc) |
Association Dues Received: $ 100 receipt number ANMDC-8806722 re: # 16 Association of Attorney Licensed Outside the District, filed by Evanston Insurance Company (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Patten, Jefferson) |
Filing 14 ANSWER to #3 Amended Complaint, by Evanston Insurance Company.(Samberg, Amy) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Strike #3 Amended Complaint, and/or Partially Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint by Evanston Insurance Company. (Samberg, Amy) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF CONSENT SUBMISSION DEADLINE: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2), the parties are reminded that a magistrate judge was assigned as the trial judge in this matter under 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The parties are advised that the Clerk will reassign this matter to a district judge as the trial judge no later than 14 days from the entry of this notice unless consents from all parties have been filed. The parties are free to withhold consent. If you have already entered your consent, you need not resubmit. (lj)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 11 Opposed MOTION to Remand to State Court and Memorandum in Support Thereof by Cincinnati Specialty Underwriting Producer Resources, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K) (Riley, Mark) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Kimberly Annise Huson on behalf of Berger-Briggs Real Estate and Insurance, Inc. (Huson, Kimberly) |
Filing 9 Berger Briggs Real Estate & Insurance, Inc.'s ANSWER to #3 Amended Complaint, for Declaratory Judgment by Berger-Briggs Real Estate and Insurance, Inc..(Steinman, Gregory) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory D. Steinman on behalf of Berger-Briggs Real Estate and Insurance, Inc. (Steinman, Gregory) |
Filing 7 NOTICE by Cincinnati Specialty Underwriting Producer Resources, Inc. Amended Notice of Errata (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Riley, Mark) |
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT Notice of Errata to Plaintiff Cincinnati Speciality Underwriting Producer Resources, Inc.'s Second Amended Complaint for Declaratory Judgment against Berger-Briggs Real Estate and Insurance, Inc., Edwin Wilson, Evanston Insurance Company., filed by Cincinnati Specialty Underwriting Producer Resources. (Riley, Mark) |
Filing 5 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea granting #4 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Defendants' Deadline to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. Defendants' response due by May 1, 2023. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. NO DOCUMENTS ARE ATTACHED.] (atc) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint by Berger-Briggs Real Estate and Insurance, Inc., Evanston Insurance Company, Edwin Wilson. (Barrett, James) |
Summons Issued on Amended Complaint as to Berger-Briggs Real Estate and Insurance, Inc., Edwin Wilson. (bc) |
Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT Cincinnati Specialty Underwriting Producer Resources, Inc.'s Second Amended Complaint for Declaratory Judgment against Berger-Briggs Real Estate and Insurance, Inc., Evanston Insurance Company., filed by Cincinnati Specialty Underwriting Producer Resources. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Riley, Mark) |
Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Evanston Insurance Company from Thirteenth Judicial District Court, County of Sandoval, case number D-1329-CV-2023-00288. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Evanston Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit Corp DS)(Samberg, Amy) |
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-8758968 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Evanston Insurance Company (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Samberg, Amy) |
United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing and United States Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea assigned. (jg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.