Bellocchio v. New Mexico Office Secretary of State et al
John Bellocchio |
New Mexico Office Secretary of State, Maggie Toulouse Oliver, Sharon Pino and Mandy Vigil |
1:2023cv00390 |
May 5, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
John F Robbenhaar |
David H Urias |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 FINAL JUDGMENT by District Judge David H. Urias. (cmm) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge David H. Urias DENYING AS MOOT #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE #1 Complaint. (cmm) |
United States District Judge David H. Urias assigned. (jg) |
Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND CURE DEFICIENCY by Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar. Show Cause Response due by 5/30/2023. Cure Deficiency by 5/30/2023. (ajp) |
Filing 3 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar has been assigned for a 28 U.S.C. 1915 review. (bc)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs by John Bellocchio. (bc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by John Bellocchio. (bc) |
U.S. Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar assigned. (bc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.