Puchalow Clinton v. United States of America et al
Petitioner: Sean Michael Puchalow Clinton
Respondent: United States of America and United States Secret Service
Case Number: 1:2023cv00428
Filed: May 18, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Presiding Judge: William P Johnson
Referring Judge: Karen B Molzen
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 NOTICE of Petitioner's Update to the Court on the Status of His Mail Reception by Sean Michael Puchalow Clinton (arp)
June 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Mail Returned as Vacant re #1 Petition for 2241 Relief. Mail sent to Sean Michael Puchalow Clinton (arp)
June 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen. Show Cause Response due by 7/24/2023. (KBM)
June 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Mail Returned as Vacant (Blank Pro Se Notification From). Mail sent to Sean Michael Puchalow Clinton (fs)
June 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #2 MOTION for Issuance. Mail sent to Sean Michael Puchalow Clinton. (fs)
June 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #1 Petition for 2241 Relief. Mail sent to Sean Michael Puchalow Clinton (arp)
May 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #2 MOTION for Issuance. Mail sent to Sean Michael Puchalow Clinton. (fs)
May 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address by Sean Michael Puchalow Clinton (arp)
May 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re Add and Terminate Judges. Mail sent to Sean Michael Puchalow Clinton (arp)
May 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Issuance of Summons to the Defendants and Plaintiff's Amendments to the Original Complaint by Sean Michael Puchalow Clinton. (arp)
May 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 1002199 (bp)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
May 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2241, filed by Sean Michael Puchalow Clinton. (jg)
May 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Chief United States District Judge William P. Johnson and United States Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen assigned. (jg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Puchalow Clinton v. United States of America et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Sean Michael Puchalow Clinton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States Secret Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?