Miller-Albarez v. Lujan Grisham et al
Krystle Xylina Miller-Albarez |
Michelle Lujan Grisham, Children Youth and Family Department, Kristina Renee Gantert, Arthur Dutchover, David Finger, Matthew J Wilson, Viridiana Meza, Hector Balderas, Matthew Albarez, Lauren Truitt, Raul Torrez, Social Security Administration and Jeff Tutter |
1:2023cv00598 |
July 14, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Laura Fashing |
William P Johnson |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 RULE 58 JUDGMENT by Chief District Judge William P. Johnson. (arp) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Chief District Judge William P. Johnson for 1 Complaint. IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. (arp) |
United States Chief District Judge William P. Johnson assigned. (dr) |
Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing. Show Cause Response due by 8/11/2023. (cda) |
Filing 4 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing has been assigned for a 28 U.S.C. 1915 review. (bc)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 3 CM/ECF Pro Se Notification Form by Krystle Xylina Miller-Albarez (bc) |
United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing assigned. (bc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.