Rivas Hernandez v. Mayorkas et al
| Sagrario Rivas Hernandez |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and Merrick Garland |
| 1:2023cv00683 |
| August 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| William P Johnson |
| Kirtan Khalsa |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin Garrett Minegar on behalf of Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (Minegar, Benjamin) |
| Summons Issued as to Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and Civil Process Clerk, Albuquerque, NM. (bc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for writ of mandamus against All Defendants ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Sagrario Rivas Hernandez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Kryzak, Heather) |
| United States Chief District Judge William P. Johnson and United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa assigned. (dr) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number BNMDC-8963927 re #1 Complaint filed by Sagrario Rivas Hernandez (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Kryzak, Heather) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
