Candelaria v. Board of County Commissioners
| Paul C Candelaria |
| Board of County Commissioners |
| 1:2023cv00807 |
| September 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Jerry H Ritter |
| Margaret I Strickland |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Briefing Complete by Board of County Commissioners re #4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Board of County Commissioners (Macke, Daniel) |
| Filing 9 Mail sent to Paul C. Candelaria Returned as Undeliverable re 5 Order, (Plaintiff not in Custody) (jjs) |
| Filing 8 REPLY to Response to Motion re #4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Board of County Commissioners. (Macke, Daniel) |
| Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #6 Response to Motion. Mail sent to Paul C. Candelaria (jn) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE to Motion re #4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Paul C Candelaria. (arp) |
Filing 5
ORDER Finding Good Cause to Delay Issuance of Scheduling Order by Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter. The pending #4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Board of County Commissioners may be dispositive and, if granted, would eliminate the need for discovery. Per Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(2), I thus find good cause to delay issuance of a scheduling order in this case until the motion is resolved. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (sjl)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Board of County Commissioners. (Macke, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Board of County Commissioners re #1 Notice of Removal, (Macke, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel J Macke on behalf of Board of County Commissioners "BernCo" (Macke, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Board of County Commissioners "BernCo" from Second Judicial District, case number D-202-CV-2023-06340. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Board of County Commissioners "BernCo". (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Complaint, #2 Exhibit B Docket, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Macke, Daniel) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-9013888 re #1 Notice of Removal, (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Macke, Daniel) |
| United States District Judge Margaret I. Strickland and United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter assigned. (bc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Candelaria v. Board of County Commissioners | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Paul C Candelaria | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Board of County Commissioners | |
| Represented By: | Daniel J Macke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
