Velarde v. Taos County Adult Detention Center et al
| Julie Velarde |
| Taos County Adult Detention Center, The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Taos, Brent Jaramillo, County of Taos, Leroy Vigil and Does 1-3 |
| 1:2023cv00878 |
| October 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Kirtan Khalsa |
| Jennifer M Rozzoni |
| David H Urias |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Briefing Complete by County of Taos, Brent Jaramillo, Taos County Adult Detention Center, The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Taos re #4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by County of Taos, The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Taos, Brent Jaramillo, Taos County Adult Detention Center (Barnett, Bree)
|
|
Filing 10
REPLY to Response to Motion re #4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by County of Taos, Brent Jaramillo, Taos County Adult Detention Center, The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Taos. (Barnett, Bree)
|
|
Filing 9
RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Julie Velarde. (Thompson, Dwight)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jennifer M. Rozzoni granting #7 Stipulated Motion to Vacate the Court's Initial Scheduling Order. The Rule 16 scheduling conference set for 11/15/2023 at 11 a.m. and all deadlines in the Court's Initial Scheduling Order (Doc. 3) are hereby vacated. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 (b)(2) and based on the concurrence of the parties, the Court finds good cause to delay entering a scheduling order at this time due to the pending dispositive motion (Doc. 4). [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (ccp)
|
|
Filing 7
Joint MOTION to Vacate the Court's Initial Scheduling Order by County of Taos, Brent Jaramillo, Taos County Adult Detention Center, The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Taos. (Barnett, Bree)
|
|
Filing 6
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly reassigned to United States District Judge David H. Urias as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (bc)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE by Julie Velarde re #4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Agreed Extension) (Thompson, Dwight)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by County of Taos, Brent Jaramillo, Taos County Adult Detention Center, The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Taos. (Barnett, Bree)
|
|
Filing 3
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jennifer M. Rozzoni. Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference set for 11/15/2023 at 11:00 AM in Albuquerque - Telephonic Hearing/Conference before Magistrate Judge Jennifer M. Rozzoni. Joint Status Report and Provisional Discovery Plan due by 11/8/2023. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than 10/31/2023. (ccp)
|
|
Filing 2
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (bc)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Taos County Adult Detention Center, The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Taos from Eighth Judicial Court, County of Taos, case number D-820-CV-2023-00317. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Taos County Adult Detention Center, The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Taos. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Plaintiff's Complaint, #3 Exhibit Plaintiff's Civil Information Sheet, #4 Exhibit Plaintiff's Jury Demand, #5 Exhibit Summons Return Leroy Vigil, #6 Exhibit Summons Return County of Taos, #7 Exhibit Summons Return Board of County Commissioners of Taos, #8 Exhibit Summons Return Brent Jaramillo, #9 Exhibit Summons Return Taos County Detention Center)(Barnett, Bree)
|
|
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-9038073 re #1 Notice of Removal,,, filed by The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Taos, Taos County Adult Detention Center (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Barnett, Bree)
|
|
United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa and United States Magistrate Judge Jennifer M. Rozzoni assigned. (bc)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
