Wright et al v. Dorchester Insurance Company Ltd.
| Roger Wright doing business as Cannabis 1 LLC and Audrey Wright doing business as Cannabis 1 LLC |
| Dorchester Insurance Company Ltd. doing business as Cannasure (CIS), Dorchester Insurance Company Ltd. and Cannasure Insurance Services |
| 1:2023cv00933 |
| October 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Kirtan Khalsa |
| David H Urias |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
FINAL JUDGMENT by District Judge David H. Urias. (fs)
|
|
Filing 10
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL by District Judge David H. Urias. (fs)
|
|
Filing 9
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to District Judge David H. Urias as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. Magistrate Judge Jennifer M. Rozzoni no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa. (jdm)
|
|
Filing 7
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Dorchester Insurance Company Ltd., Cannasure Insurance Services. Adding Cannasure Insurance Services., filed by Roger Wright, Audrey Wright. (jg)
|
|
Filing 6
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Jennifer M. Rozzoni to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (ng)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa granting #2 Motion to Proceed under 28 U.S.C. 1915; denying #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel and ORDER for amended complaint. Plaintiffs shall, within 21 days of entry of this Order, file an amended complaint. Failure to timely file an amended complaint may result in dismissal of this case. (jdm) Modified docket text on 10/24/2023 (ng).
|
|
United States Magistrate Judge Jennifer M. Rozzoni assigned. (ng)
|
|
Filing 4
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa has been assigned for a 28 U.S.C. 1915 review. (jg)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
|
|
United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa assigned. (jg)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Audrey Wright, Roger Wright. (jg)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Proceed under 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Audrey Wright, Roger Wright. (jg)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Dorchester Insurance Company Ltd., filed by Roger Wright, Audrey Wright. (jg)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
