In House Convenience, LLC v. The United States of America
In House Convenience, LLC |
The United States of America |
1:2023cv00985 |
November 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Laura Fashing |
John F Robbenhaar |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER REGARDING ORDER OF SUSPENSION by Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar. Plaintiff's counsel is ordered to file a Motion to Withdraw pursuant to D.N.M.LR-Civ. 83.8 within thirty days of this Order. Plaintiff's counsel's failure to comply with this Order could result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. (kc) |
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-9087163 re #1 Complaint filed by In House Convenience, LLC (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Klein, Henry) |
Filing 3 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), In House Convenience, LLC voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Klein, Henry)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (bc) |
United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing and United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar assigned. (bc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The United States of America ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by In House Convenience, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit In Globo Appendix A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Klein, Henry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: In House Convenience, LLC v. The United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Appellant: In House Convenience, LLC | |
Represented By: | Henry L Klein |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Appellee: The United States of America | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.