I.H.E. et al v. Mayorkas et al
| I.H.E., V.H.E., Maria Espinoza Aguilar and Jaime Hernandez Olivares |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou, United Citizenship and Immigration Services and Merrick Garland |
| 1:2023cv01062 |
| November 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| James O Browning |
| John F Robbenhaar |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas M Sydow on behalf of Merrick Garland, Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, United Citizenship and Immigration Services (Sydow, Nicholas) |
| Summons Issued as to Merrick Garland, Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, United Citizenship and Immigration Services, and U.S. Attorney (jg) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-9114512 re #1 Complaint filed by Jaime Hernandez Olivares, Maria Espinoza Aguilar, V.H.E., I.H.E. (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Kryzak, Heather) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for writ of mandamus against All Defendants ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Maria Espinoza Aguilar, V.H.E., Jaime Hernandez Olivares, I.H.E.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Kryzak, Heather) |
| United States District Judge James O. Browning and United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar assigned. (jg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
