Velarde v. Board of Commissioners for Bernalillo County et al
| Aaron Velarde |
| Board of Commissioners for Bernalillo County and Bernalillo County Sheriff's Department |
| 1:2023cv01135 |
| December 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Kea W Riggs |
| John F Robbenhaar |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Briefing Complete by Aaron Velarde re #9 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Aaron Velarde (Nelson, Amelia) |
| Filing 14 REPLY to Response to Motion re #9 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Aaron Velarde. (Nelson, Amelia) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Bernalillo County Sheriff's Department, Board of Commissioners for Bernalillo County. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Wells, Deborah) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE REGARDING DOCUMENT ENTRIES: Because this case has been reassigned to a district judge, please be advised that any documents filed by the parties under Rule 73(b) have been permanently removed from the docket. Document(s) removed: No. 8. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (kg) |
Filing 11
ORDER FINDING GOOD CAUSE TO DELAY SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar. All instructions, deadlines and hearings in the Initial Scheduling Order (Doc. 6) are VACATED. (kc)
|
| Filing 10 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly reassigned to United States District Judge Kea W. Riggs as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (bc) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Aaron Velarde. (Nelson, Amelia) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF CONSENT SUBMISSION DEADLINE: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2), the parties are reminded that a magistrate judge was assigned as the trial judge in this matter under 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The parties are advised that the Clerk will reassign this matter to a district judge as the trial judge no later than 3 days from the entry of this notice unless consents from all parties have been filed. The parties are free to withhold consent. If you have already entered your consent, you need not resubmit. (lj)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
|
Filing 6
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: by Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar. Joint Status Report due by 1/29/2024. Telephone Scheduling Conference set for 2/8/2024 at 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar. Counsel will call Judge Robbenhaar's AT&T Teleconference Line at 888-363-4735, Access Code 2387395, to connect to the proceedings. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than 1/11/2024. (kc)
|
| Filing 5 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
| Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Bernalillo County Sheriff's Department, Board of Commissioners for Bernalillo County (Wells, Deborah) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Bernalillo County Sheriff's Department, Board of Commissioners for Bernalillo County. (Wells, Deborah) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing and United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar assigned. (jg) |
| Filing 2 Transmittal of State Court Documents by Bernalillo County Sheriff's Department, Board of Commissioners for Bernalillo County (Attachments: #1 State Court Record) (Wells, Deborah) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Board of Commissioners for Bernalillo County, Bernalillo County Sheriff's Department from Second Judicial District Court, case number D-202-CV-2023-08517. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Board of Commissioners for Bernalillo County, Bernalillo County Sheriff's Department. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Wells, Deborah) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 405 receipt number BNMDC-9143090 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Board of Commissioners for Bernalillo County, Bernalillo County Sheriff's Department (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Wells, Deborah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
