Speridian Technologies LLC v. Bhaskaran
Speridian Technologies LLC |
Balasubramani S. Bhaskaran |
1:2023cv01162 |
December 28, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Laura Fashing |
Steven C Yarbrough |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Speridian Technologies LLC identifying Corporate Parent Speridian Global Holdings, LLC for Speridian Technologies LLC. (Chappell, Susan) |
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Balasubramani S. Bhaskaran., filed by Speridian Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Subramani Employment Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Consulting Services Agreement, #3 Exhibit C - CSA 2021 Addendum, #4 Exhibit D - Resignation Letter, #5 Exhibit E - Speridian June 5 Letter, #6 Summons)(Chappell, Susan) |
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 405 receipt number ANMDC-9151268 re #1 Complaint, filed by Speridian Technologies LLC (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Chappell, Susan) |
Filing 3 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough to file Rule 7.1 notice and to amend complaint by 01/12/2024. (cm) |
Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (bc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Balasubramani S. Bhaskaran ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Speridian Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Subramani Employment Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Consulting Services Agreement, #3 Exhibit C - CSA 2021 Addendum, #4 Exhibit D - Resignation Letter, #5 Exhibit E - Speridian June 5 Letter, #6 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Summons)(Chappell, Susan) |
United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing and United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough assigned. (bc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Speridian Technologies LLC v. Bhaskaran | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Speridian Technologies LLC | |
Represented By: | Susan G. Chappell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Balasubramani S. Bhaskaran | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.