Lopez v. Fowler et al
Plaintiff: Deanna Louise Lopez
Defendant: Lanny Fowler and Allsup's Convenience Stores Inc
Case Number: 1:2024cv00092
Filed: January 29, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Presiding Judge: John F Robbenhaar
Referring Judge: Martha Vazquez
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 FINAL JUDGMENT by District Judge Martha Vazquez. (fs)
March 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER of DISMISSAL by District Judge Martha Vazquez DENYING #7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, DENYING #8 MOTION for Service by Publication. (fs)
March 4, 2024 Opinion or Order United States District Judge Martha Vazquez assigned. (bc)
February 16, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE of USM-285 Form by Deanna Louise Lopez re #8 MOTION for Service by Publication. (eh)
February 16, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION for Service by Publication by Deanna Louise Lopez. (eh)
February 6, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Application To Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs by Deanna Louise Lopez. (bc)
February 6, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Allsup's Convenience Stores Inc, Lanny Fowler., filed by Deanna Louise Lopez. (bc)
February 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar GRANTING #2 Plaintiff's Application for Free Process, and DENYING #3 Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Plaintiff shall, within 21 days of entry of this Order: (a) show cause why the Court should not dismiss this case; and (b) file an amended complaint. (ajp)
January 29, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar has been assigned for a 28 U.S.C. 1915 review. (jg)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
January 29, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel and Request for Hearing by Deanna Louise Lopez. (gr)
January 29, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Deanna Louise Lopez. (gr)
January 29, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Deanna Louise Lopez. (gr)
January 29, 2024 Opinion or Order United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar assigned. (jg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lopez v. Fowler et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deanna Louise Lopez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lanny Fowler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Allsup's Convenience Stores Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?