Medina v. Romero et al
Plaintiff: Esther Raquel Medina
Defendant: Peggy Romero, Joscelyn Lester and Children Youth and Family Department
Case Number: 1:2024cv00140
Filed: February 9, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Presiding Judge: Kenneth J Gonzales
Referring Judge: Steven C Yarbrough
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 FINAL JUDGMENT by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales. (tah)
March 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales dismissing this case without prejudice; and denying #9 Plaintiff's Motion for Service. (tah)
March 5, 2024 Opinion or Order United States District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales assigned. (bc)
February 20, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION for Service by Esther Raquel Medina. (dr)
February 20, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants., filed by Esther Raquel Medina. (dr)
February 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 APPENDIX/SUPPLEMENT to 1 COMPLAINT by Esther Raquel Medina (jg)
February 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CM/ECF PRO SE NOTIFICATION FORM electing to receive notification via Postal Mail by Esther Raquel Medina (jg) Modified docket text on 2/20/2024 (dr).
February 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and Order to Show Cause. Show Cause Response due by 3/4/2024. (kfo)
February 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough has been assigned for a 28 U.S.C. 1915 review. (bc)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
February 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CM/ECF PRO SE NOTIFICATION FORM by Esther Raquel Medina (bc)
February 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Esther Raquel Medina. (bc)
February 9, 2024 Opinion or Order United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough assigned. (bc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Medina v. Romero et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Esther Raquel Medina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peggy Romero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joscelyn Lester
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Children Youth and Family Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?