United States of America et al v. Apache Corporation
| United States of America and New Mexico Environment Department |
| Apache Corporation |
| 1:2024cv00149 |
| February 13, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Kirtan Khalsa |
| Kevin R Sweazea |
| David H Urias |
| Environmental Matters |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CONSENT DECREE by District Judge David H. Urias re #8 Motion for Settlement to Enter Proposed Consent Decree (arp) |
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Settlement to Enter Proposed Consent Decree by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Memorandum in Support of Unopposed Motion to Enter Consent Decree) (Veilleux, Nicole) |
| Filing 7 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to District Judge David H. Urias as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (eh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF CONSENT SUBMISSION DEADLINE: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2), the parties are reminded that a magistrate judge was assigned as the trial judge in this matter under 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The parties are advised that the Clerk will reassign this matter to a district judge as the trial judge no later than 21 days from the entry of this notice unless consents from all parties have been filed. The parties are free to withhold consent. If you have already entered your consent, you need not resubmit. (nlb)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Dalva L Moellenberg on behalf of Apache Corporation (Moellenberg, Dalva) |
| Filing 4 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (bc) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Settlement Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree by United States of America (Attachments: #1 Proposed Consent Decree) (Veilleux, Nicole) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicole Veilleux on behalf of United States of America (Veilleux, Nicole) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Apache Corporation ( Filing Fee - Waived), filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Veilleux, Nicole) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea and United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa assigned. (bc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
