Jackson v. Baker Hughes Inc.
Plaintiff: James R. Jackson
Defendant: Baker Hughes Inc
Case Number: 1:2024cv00183
Filed: February 23, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Presiding Judge: Kirtan Khalsa
Referring Judge: John F Robbenhaar
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 18, 2024 Filing 18 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Baker Hughes Inc Defendant's Initial Disclosures Certificate of Service (Braquet, Matthew)
April 15, 2024 Filing 17 Joint Status Report and Provisional Discovery Plan by Baker Hughes Inc (Braquet, Matthew)
April 3, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER CHANGING TIME OF TELEPHONIC RULE 16 INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa. Hearing is reset for 4/25/2024 at 09:00 AM in Albuquerque before Judge Khalsa. Counsel and any pro se parties are to call the Court's AT&T conference line at (877) 848-7030 and enter the code 7324132 to connect to the proceedings. All other provisions of the Court's Initial Scheduling Order (Doc. 11) remain in effect. (eh)
March 26, 2024 Filing 15 NOTICE OF RULE 73 CONSENT Received by All Parties. Related documents: 14 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, filed by Baker Hughes Inc, #13 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, filed by James R. Jackson. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (bc)
March 25, 2024 Filing 14 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Baker Hughes Inc voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Braquet, Matthew)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
March 20, 2024 Filing 13 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), James R. Jackson voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (jg)
March 20, 2024 Filing 12 CM/ECF PRO SE NOTIFICATION FORM electing to receive notification via E-Mail by James R. Jackson (jg)
March 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa. Counsel and any pro se parties are to meet and confer by 4/4/2024. The parties' Joint Status Report and Provisional Discovery Plan is due by 4/15/2024. A Telephonic Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference is set for 4/25/2024 at 10:30 AM before Judge Khalsa. Counsel and any pro se parties are to call the Court's AT&T conference line at (877) 848-7030 and enter the code 7324132 to connect to the proceedings. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than 4/18/2024. (dr)
March 15, 2024 Filing 10 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) and Affirmative Defenses by Baker Hughes Inc. (Kountz, Melissa)
March 11, 2024 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Melissa Marie Kountz on behalf of Baker Hughes Inc (Kountz, Melissa)
March 11, 2024 Filing 8 ASSOCIATION of Attorney Licensed Outside the District for Defendant Baker Hughes Inc by Melissa Marie Kountz on behalf of: MaryJo L. Roberts The Kullman Firm 1100 Poydras Street, Suite 1600New Orleans, LA 70163 504-596-4195 Fax 504-596-4114 MLR@kullmanlaw.com (Association Dues - Online Payment) (Kountz, Melissa)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
March 11, 2024 Filing 7 ASSOCIATION of Attorney Licensed Outside the District for Defendant Baker Hughes Inc by Melissa Marie Kountz on behalf of: Matthew J. Braquet The Kullman Firm 1100 Poydras Street, Suite 1600New Orleans, LA 70163 504-596-4195 Fax 504-596-4114 MJB@Kullmanlaw.com (Association Dues - Online Payment) (Kountz, Melissa)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
March 11, 2024 Association Dues Received: $ 100 receipt number ANMDC-9258447 re: # 7 Association of Attorney Licensed Outside the District, filed by Baker Hughes Inc (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Kountz, Melissa)
March 11, 2024 Association Dues Received: $ 100 receipt number ANMDC-9258468 re: # 8 Association of Attorney Licensed Outside the District, filed by Baker Hughes Inc (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Kountz, Melissa)
March 1, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint Baker Hughes Inc answer due 3/15/2024. (jg)
February 29, 2024 Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint by Baker Hughes Inc. (Kountz, Melissa)
February 23, 2024 Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 405, receipt number ANMDC-9234971 re #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Baker Hughes Inc from Eleventh Judicial District Court, case number D-1116-CV-2021-00078. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Baker Hughes Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit)(Kountz, Melissa) filed by Baker Hughes Inc (arp)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
February 23, 2024 Filing 3 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr)
February 23, 2024 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Baker Hughes Inc (Kountz, Melissa)
February 23, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Baker Hughes Inc from Eleventh Judicial District Court, case number D-1116-CV-2021-00078. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Baker Hughes Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit)(Kountz, Melissa)
February 23, 2024 United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar and United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa assigned. (dr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackson v. Baker Hughes Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James R. Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Baker Hughes Inc
Represented By: Melissa Marie Kountz
Represented By: MaryJo L. Roberts
Represented By: Matthew James Braquet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?