Reeves et al v. Ford Motor Company
Kelly R. Reeves, Jessica Reeves and Jessica E Reeves |
Ford Motor Company |
1:2024cv00220 |
March 4, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Jerry H Ritter |
John F Robbenhaar |
Contract Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter SETTING an in-person Settlement Conference for Monday, June 17, 2024, at 9:00 a.m. Mountain Time in the Chama Courtroom in the Pete V. Domenici U.S. Courthouse in Albuquerque. Position statements are due to the Court by Monday, June 10, 2024. A telephonic Status Conference is also hereby set for Tuesday, June 4, 2024, at 9:00 a.m. to discuss the parties readiness for the Settlement Conference. Counsel shall call the Court's AT&T conference line to connect to the Status Conference: 888-278-0296 (access code: 9998216#). (ama) |
Filing 14 SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter. Discovery terminates October 1, 2024. Discovery motions are due by October 8, 2024. Pretrial motions are due by November 12, 2024. (ama) |
Filing 13 Clerk's Minutes for telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference held before Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter on April 29, 2024. Michael Craddock appeared for Plaintiffs and Jarrod Greth appeared for Defendant. The parties reported no issues with initial disclosures. The Court informed the parties of its discovery dispute procedure of an informal telephonic conference prior to filing motions. The parties discussed a discovery plan and deadlines memorialized in the Scheduling Order. An in-person settlement conference is anticipated in Albuquerque in June 2024. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (ama) |
Filing 12 Joint Status Report and Provisional Discovery Plan by Ford Motor Company (Greth, Jarrod) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF RULE 73 CONSENT Received by All Parties. Related documents: 9 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, filed by Jessica E Reeves, Kelly R. Reeves, 8 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, filed by Ford Motor Company. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael J Craddock on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Craddock, Michael) |
Filing 9 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Jessica E Reeves, Kelly R. Reeves voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Craddock, Michael)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 8 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Ford Motor Company voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Greth, Jarrod)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 7 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter SETTING a telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference for Monday, April 29, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. Mountain Time. Counsel shall call Judge Ritter's AT&T Conference Line to connect to the hearing: 888-278-0296 (access code: 9998216#). JSR and initial disclosures are due by Monday, April 22, 2024. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than Monday, April 22, 2024. (ama) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Ford Motor Company. (Greth, Jarrod) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Ford Motor Company (Greth, Jarrod) |
Filing 4 APPENDIX/SUPPLEMENT re #1 Notice of Removal Civil Cover Sheet by Ford Motor Company (Greth, Jarrod) |
Filing 3 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (bc) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jarrod Alec Greth on behalf of All Defendants (Greth, Jarrod) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Ford Motor Company from Eleventh Judicial District Court, case number D-1116-CV-2024-000158. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Ford Motor Company. (Greth, Jarrod) |
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 405 receipt number ANMDC-9247739 re #1 Notice of Removal filed by Ford Motor Company (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Greth, Jarrod) |
United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar and United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter assigned. (bc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.