Enciso v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company
| Dine Enciso |
| Progressive Northern Insurance Company |
| 1:2024cv00323 |
| April 4, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Kirtan Khalsa |
| Kevin R Sweazea |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (bc) |
| Filing 4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Count XI by Progressive Northern Insurance Company. (Kaselonis, Taryn) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Progressive Northern Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent The Progressive Corporation, Corporate Parent Progressive Agency Holdings, Inc. for Progressive Northern Insurance Company. (Kaselonis, Taryn) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Progressive Northern Insurance Company. (Kaselonis, Taryn) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Progressive Northern Insurance Company from Second Judicial District Court, Bernalillo County, case number D-202-CV-2024-01719. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Progressive Northern Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kaselonis, Taryn) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 405 receipt number ANMDC-9296446 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Progressive Northern Insurance Company (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Kaselonis, Taryn) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea and United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa assigned. (bc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Enciso v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dine Enciso | |
| Represented By: | Aaron J Pinon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Progressive Northern Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Courtenay L Keller |
| Represented By: | Taryn M Kaselonis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
