Saul et al v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
| Roger Saul and Alma A Saul |
| U.S. Bank National Association, Nationstar Mortgage LLC and MTGLQ Investors, LP |
| 1:2024cv00362 |
| April 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Kirtan Khalsa |
| David H Urias |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
FINAL JUDGMENT by District Judge David H. Urias. (fs)
|
|
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re #1 Complaint by District Judge David H. Urias. (fs)
|
|
District Judge David H. Urias assigned. (dr)
|
|
Filing 6
Filing fee: $ 405, receipt number 1004731 (da)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
|
|
Filing 5
AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants., filed by Roger Saul and Alma A. Saul. (jg) Modified to add additional plaintiff on 5/3/2024 (bc).
|
|
Filing 4
CONSENT TO PROCEED by Roger Saul (jg)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa. (jdm)
|
|
Filing 2
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa has been assigned for a 28 U.S.C. 1915 review. (dr)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
|
|
United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa assigned. (dr)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Roger Saul, Alma A Saul. (dr)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
