Priola v. GEICO General Insurance Company
Kathy Priola |
GEICO General Insurance Company |
1:2024cv00478 |
May 16, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Laura Fashing |
Steven C Yarbrough |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by GEICO General Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Government Employees Insurance Company, Other Affiliate Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., Other Affiliate GEICO Corporation for GEICO General Insurance Company. (Keller, Courtenay) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by GEICO General Insurance Company. (Keller, Courtenay) |
Filing 2 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Count II by GEICO General Insurance Company. (Keller, Courtenay) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by GEICO General Insurance Company from First Judicial District Court, Santa Fe County, case number D-101-CV-2024-00301. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by GEICO General Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Keller, Courtenay) |
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 405 receipt number ANMDC-9360567 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by GEICO General Insurance Company (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Keller, Courtenay) |
United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough and United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing assigned. (jg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Priola v. GEICO General Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kathy Priola | |
Represented By: | Devi Maria Schmidt |
Represented By: | Jonathan D. Woods |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: GEICO General Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Taryn M Kaselonis |
Represented By: | Courtenay L Keller |
Represented By: | Pablo Andres Seifert |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.