Cordero v. Froats et al
| Elvia Cordero |
| Todd Froats, Peter Bradley, Cody Austin and City of Las Cruces |
| 2:2013cv00031 |
| January 11, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Las Cruces Office |
| Dona Ana |
| Judith C. Herrera |
| Gregory B. Wormuth |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
197
STIPULATED ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar GRANTING 193 the parties' Joint Motion to Dismiss (am)
|
|
Filing
191
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar DENYING 178 Defendants' Motion to Enforce Settlement and RESERVING RULING on 177 Mr. Lyle's Charging Lien. (am)
|
|
Filing
187
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar SETTING second in-person evidentiary hearing on 177 Attorney's Charging Lien and 178 Motion to Enforce Settlement on April 5, 2018, at 9:30 a.m. in 460 Organ Courtroom (South Tower) in Las C ruces. Any exhibit that Plaintiff, Defendant, or Mr. Lyle wishes to admit into evidence---including those exhibits admitted at the February 22, 2018 hearing---must be filed on the record and copies served on all others no later than March 29, 2018. (am)
|
|
Filing
181
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE and ORDER VACATING TRIAL by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar. Plaintiff's Show-Cause Response is due by November 9, 2017. The TRIAL set to be begin on November 13, 2017, is VACATED. (am)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
