Khan v. Barela et al
| Erik Khan |
| Chris Barela, Elva Bright, Gordon Devereaux, Bill Stickles, FNU Beam, Justin Porter, Vicki Hooser, Cheryl Roach, Jason Duran, Tammy Rush and Dona Ana County |
| 2:2015cv01151 |
| December 14, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Las Cruces Office |
| Dona Ana |
| Martha Vazquez |
| Stephan M. Vidmar |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
163
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar GRANTING 162 Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate ADR Order. The Court's order contemplating the setting of a settlement conference 156 is VACATED and the telephonic status conference set for February 9, 2022, is VACATED. (nlb)
|
|
Filing
161
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar SETTING telephonic Status Conference for February 9, 2022, at 11:30 a.m. MST. Counsel must call Judge Vidmar's AT&T Conference Line at (888) 363-4734 (access code: 4382538) to connect to the proceedings. (nlb)
|
|
Filing
146
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar GRANTING IN PART 128 Plaintiff's Motion for Order Directing Preparation of Martinez Report. Defendants' Martinez Report is due by September 7, 2021. Plaintiff's response is due by October 21, 2021. Defendants' reply is due by November 8, 2021. (rcf)
|
|
Filing
145
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar DENYING 142 Plaintiff's Motion to Disqualify Counsel. (rcf)
|
|
Filing
137
ORDER ADOPTING 136 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by District Judge Martha Vazquez; DENYING 123 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Aramark Corporation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Aramark's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 123 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Aramark file a responsive pleading within 14 days of the issuance of this Order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4)(A). (gr)
|
|
Filing
136
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar to DENY 123 Defendant Aramark's Motion to Dismiss. Objections to PF&RD due by January 26, 2021. Add 3 days to the deadline if service is by mailing it to the person's last known address (or means described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(D) and (F)); if service is by electronic means, no additional days are added. (Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d); Fed. R. Crim. P. 45(c).) (rcf)
|
|
Filing
133
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Martha Vazquez GRANTING 130 MOTION to Dismiss Party. David Beam and Bill Stickles terminated. See order for specifics. (gr)
|
|
Filing
127
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar to DENY 112 Defendants Beam and Stickles's Motion to Dismiss. Objections to PF&RD due by October 22, 2020. Add 3 days to the deadline i f service is by mail to the person's last known address (or means described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(D), (F)); if service is by electronic means, no additional days are added. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d); Fed. R. Crim. P. 45(c). (rcf)
|
|
Filing
120
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 117 Plaintiff's Motion for Personal Service on Defendant Aramark and DIRECTING the Clerk to Re-Issue Notice and Waiver-of-Service Form as to Defendant Aramark. (am)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar GRANTING 96 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint, AMENDING the Caption, and DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to DOCKET the Third Amended Complaint and to ISSUE Notice and Waiver-of-Service Forms. (am)
|
|
Filing
83
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Martha Vazquez DENYING 82 MOTION for Order; and DISMISSING 70 Amended Complaint. See Order for Specifics. (gr)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar DENYING as premature 77 Plaintiff Erik Khan's Motion for Order to Issue Summons and Memorandum of Law in Support. (sg)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar DENYING as moot 71 , 72 , 73 , and 74 Plaintiff's motions to stay case and also to lift stay of case. (am)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
